<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which HDTV providor is the best to go with for the money?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalhdpro.com/which-hdtv-providor-is-the-best-to-go-with-for-the-money/252/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalhdpro.com/which-hdtv-providor-is-the-best-to-go-with-for-the-money/252/</link>
	<description>Your Digital HDTV Resource</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reggieman2</title>
		<link>http://digitalhdpro.com/which-hdtv-providor-is-the-best-to-go-with-for-the-money/252/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggieman2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalhdpro.com/which-hdtv-providor-is-the-best-to-go-with-for-the-money/252/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Well, the BEST provider is DISH NETWORK....

MORE HD channels, Bigger Dish (best reception in storms)
and you don't have to WAIT for cable to bring a NEW network online, also you get your LOCAL stations.....

Those are the reasons I no longer have CABLE or Direct TV....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the BEST provider is DISH NETWORK&#8230;.</p>
<p>MORE HD channels, Bigger Dish (best reception in storms)<br />
and you don&#8217;t have to WAIT for cable to bring a NEW network online, also you get your LOCAL stations&#8230;..</p>
<p>Those are the reasons I no longer have CABLE or Direct TV&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

